Don’t put your name on the birth certificate

Guys…. this is a warning to you!

Don’t put your name on the birth certificate if they baby is not yours.

You may be liable for child support till that child reaches college age.

For those of you thinking that you will have any rights….. your wrong.
For those of you suffering from Knight in Shining Armour syndrome….
…she’s probably no princess.

If your going to get married to a woman that is pregnant with someone else’s child and think your going to have a ready made family then think again. if things fall apart you will only be financially responsible. You won’t actually have any rights over that child.

1 in 5 Child Support Claims are fraudulent

Single moms are purposely naming the wrong person as the daddy of their kids when making financial claims for child support.

Others had so many sexual partners that they are uncertain exactly which one is the daddy, meaning they coincidentally give CSA officers the inaccurate identity. Child support Agency figures show that almost one in 5 of the contested paternity claims it handled last year cleared the person originally named as the daddy.

It’s a criminal offence to make a fake statement or representation and to provide fake documents or info. But, according to the CSA, there hasn’t been a single prosecution of a mum for making a fake claim. It is the highest proportion since the agency started assembling figures nationally. ‘This is an intensely troubling trend and one where correct action should be taken,’ announced Tory work and pensions speaker Chris Grayling. Under CSA rules, a person has to pay maintenance as fast as he is named the kid’s father. He will be able to challenge the ruling by asking for a DNA test, but must pay for it himself. The pricetag, typically £257, is reimbursed by taxpayers if the paternity claim is located to be incorrect, but there’s no comeback on the ma for making a fake claim. The DNA tests involve taking a blood sample or swab of cells from within the cheek. Research by the Tories has demonstrated that of the more than 6,200 absent folks living abroad, only a quarter pay any child assistance and five thousand owe a total of more than £26million.

The soon-to-be ditched CSA is more expensive than £500million a year to run and has a buildup of 121,000 cases. More than one in 3 absent pops fails to pay any upkeep, leaving £3.8billion excellent, of which £2.2billion is ‘probably uncollectable’. The agency is lined up to be replaced by the Child Upkeep and Enforcement Commission by 2013.

A Dep. for Work and Pensions spokesperson said : ‘We have a fair and tough system in place to make sure that where paternity is disputed a DNA test can be brought to create the daddy of a kid. ‘Of the total caseload handled by the CSA in 2007-2008 only 1 % led to a DNA test and the argument was upheld in less than 0.2 percent of cases.

‘The CSA will consider each case on its own merits before making a call to take criminal events against an individual. In each case there would have to be decisive proof to prove in court the girl intentionally named the wrong person as the daddy. ‘The agency would also think about the effect on the well being of the kid of a call to prosecute. ‘.

Changing name after marriage

I posted a interesting story about a emasculated colleague of mine who changed his name to include his wifes name, essentially ending up with a double barrel name.
Now I got to admit he works extremely hard and is often away from home, maybe 3-4 times a month. And of course, being a woman that wants everything.. he needs to earn more money and be at home to help with the baby. A child that is not his, she was pregnant by another man when she married him! He had knight in shining armour syndrome.

Anyway… after less that two years.. he’s been kicked out (no doubt of the home he bought) and is getting a divorce.

Now… what is he going to do with his extra surname? I guess the reason she wanted to keep hers is because she is always getting married and subsequently divorced…. Oh dear…. I guess he should of headed those warning signs.

We Regretfully Invite You…

This picture of a wedding invitation dropped in my mailbox today…. I guess his parents don’t approve.

Tricking men for a meal ticket

My gripe is about females that trick men into parenthood and have children by as many possible men. As these women go on their merry way producing more offspring for the welfare state to support, do they give a thought about anybody’s feelings but there own? Did the man concerned want children with them? They my have been fine for a casual thing, but as the mother of his children, perhaps not! I know.. I know… you was on the pill and forgot to take it… yeah right.. If I had a penny for every time that excuse has been used I’d be a rich man

These despicable women seem to look no further than the next benefit cheque or CSA payment. Their children’s education goes to pot when they decide to chase the next man. Isn’t it time we stopped paying these women to continue the moral and social decline of our countries?

The professional baby mommas who getting pregnant to ensnare a man with money, or to keep a roof over their head. These women are leeches on the men they sleep with and the society that they bankrupt. They need to get of their fat back-sides and stop expecting other people to pay their way in life.

Before you trap some poor man who obviously would never pick you to bear his children, think of the quality of life the child will have coming from a broken family you selfish being.

And guys… lower your standards.. that bird with 3 different kids from different baby fathers is probably good in bed, but do you really want her to have your child?